Transcripts of Jan. 31 and Feb. 1 hearings of Corona impeachment trial

An impeachable offense is whatever a majority of the House of Representatives considers it to be at a given moment in history;

conviction results from whatever offense or offenses two-thirds of the other body considers to be sufficiently serious to require removal of the accused from office.

Gerald Ford, telling it like it is, in his attempt to impeach Justice William Orville Douglas [one of the great liberals, along with CJ Earl Warren, Hugo Black, Frank Murphy (fomer gov-gen of PI;diyan galing ang pangalang Murphy, Cubao), and Wiley Rutledge.]

Totoo naman. Dahil the House has the sole power to impeach. They can impeach on any ground, since they define what is an impeachable offense, for purposes of charging a Respondent.

This is especially true, since, as Monching Mitra stated, Congressmen will sign anything, even a table napkin.

Now the Senate, can convict on anything, also having sole authority. They, in their judgment, determine what is impeachable, for purposes of conviction.

Hindi kasama ang taumbayan diyan. In the only verifiable act of the taumbayan (the ballot) they gave the decision-making power to the Senate, when they ratified the Constitution.

Perjury? In the case of Bill Clinton, impeachable daw, sabi ng House. Bokya daw, sabi ng Senate.

Issuance of a TRO? Impeachable daw, sabi ni Congressman William Wheeler (complainant), when Justice William Douglas issued a stay on the execution of the Julius and Ethel Rosenberg (found guilty of passing secrets of the A bomb to the Soviets).

Bokya daw sabi ng House Justice Committee.

Later, these Soviets said the following:

Boris V. Brokhovich

The engineer who later became director of Chelyabinsk-40, the plutonium production reactor and extraction facility which the Soviet Union used to create its first bomb material, denied any involvement by the Rosenbergs. In 1989, Boris V. Brokhovich told The New York Times in an interview that development of the bomb had been a matter of trial and error. “You sat the Rosenbergs in the electric chair for nothing“, he said. “We got nothing from the Rosenbergs.”]

Alexandre Feklisov

According to Alexandre Feklisov, the former Soviet agent who was Julius’ contact, he had not provided the Soviet Union with any useful material about the atomic bomb, “He didn’t understand anything about the atomic bomb and he couldn’t help us.”

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julius_and_Ethel_Rosenberg

Lagyan ng “http://” sa harap.

Conduct unbecoming, because of ties with a casino, and “defense of a filthy film” (Justice William Douglas again); impeachable daw, sabi ng complainant (Gerald Ford). Bokya daw sabi ng House Justice Committee.

The hearings began in late April 1970. Congressman Ford was the main witness, and attacked Douglas’s “liberal opinions,” his “defense of the ‘filthy’ film” I Am Curious (Yellow), and his ties with the aforementioned Parvin. Additionally, Douglas was criticized for accepting $350 for an article he wrote on folk music in the magazine Avant Garde. The magazine’s publisher had served a prison sentence for the distribution of another magazine in 1966 that had been deemed pornographic. Describing Douglas’s article, Ford stated, “The article itself is not pornographic, although it praises the lusty, lurid, and risqué along with the social protest of left-wing folk singers.” Ford also attacked Douglas for his article in Evergreen Magazine, which was infamous for its proclivity for pictures of naked women. The Republican congressmen, however, refused to give the majority Democrats copies of the magazines, prompting Congressman Wayne Hays to remark “Has anybody read the article – or is everybody over there who has a magazine just looking at the pictures?

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_O._Douglas#Impeachment_attempts

Lagyan ng “http://” sa harap.