Skip to content

ASEAN and Suu Kyi’s deafening silence on Rohingya plight

NY Times:Rohingya migrants swam to collect food supplies dropped by a Thai Army helicopter in the Andaman Sea. Credit Christophe Archambault/Agence France-Presse — Getty Images
NY Times:Rohingya migrants swam to collect food supplies dropped by a Thai Army helicopter in the Andaman Sea. Credit Christophe Archambault/Agence France-Presse — Getty Images

Adrift in the Andaman Sea are hundreds of thousands of people in the verge of death due to hunger, thirst and victims of human cruelty.

They are the Rohingyas, a Muslim ethnic group mainly living in Myanmar. It is estimated that they number some 800,000 and comprise 80 to 90 percent of the state of Rakhine.

Boatloads of them have fled Myanmar where they are being persecuted. Myanmar does not consider them its citizens. History accounts say they migrated from Bengal during the 1700s during the British rule. Although some scholars say they are indigenous to the state of Rakhine.

BBC’s primer on Rohingya is most helpful in understanding the humanitarian crisis that the Association of Southeast Asian Nations or ASEAN is hard put to confront.

Why are they fleeing Myanmar?

The BBC primer explains that “Successive Myanmar governments have been introducing policies to repress the Rohingya since the 1960s.They argue that Rohingyas are not a genuine ethnic group but Bengali migrants who represent a divisive leftover from colonial times.

They are denied basic services and their movements are severely restricted. The repression of the Rohingyas has gradually intensified since the process of reforms introduced by President Thein Sein in 2011.

The oppression they suffer there is so severe “that they feel they have no option but to leave”, Bangkok-based Rohingya expert Chris Lewa told the BBC.

Crying out for help from the sea. BBC
Crying out for help from the sea. BBC

So inflammatory is the Rohingya issue in Myanmar that democracy icon Aung San Suu Kyi, who is now a member of the parliament after years of imprisonment, has not been heard on her views about the persecution of the Rohingyas.

What’s the attitude of ASEAN countries where the boatloads of Rohingyas have tried to seek refuge to?
From BBC’s primer:

Thailand: Its Navy says that it has given aid to migrant boats in its waters, and it has indicated that it may be prepared to allow refugee camps on its shores. But it does not want permanent settlers, and few Rohingyas want to settle in the country even if the alternative is to remain on cramped boats.

Malaysia: This is the choice of destination for most Rohingya travellers, especially because it is predominantly Muslim and short of unskilled labourers. But Malaysia has made clear that it will not accept boatloads of migrants and has ordered its navy to repel them.

Bangladesh: For the last 20 years has been subjected to an influx of Rohingyas, sometimes allowing them to live in camps on its south-eastern border and sometimes sending them back to Myanmar. It is estimated that there are currently about 200,000 Rohingyas living in refugee camps, many in squalid conditions.

Indonesia: Like Malaysia is a Muslim country and like Malaysia has made clear that the Rohingyas are not welcome, with its navy turning away boatloads of migrants. A group of migrants who made it ashore in early May may be expelled, the government has warned.

The attitude of Indonesia, Malaysia and Thailand on the Rohingya’s is appalling considering that just two weeks ago,ASEAN Leaders (including Myanmar) in their 26th summit signed a “Kuala Lumpur Declaration on a People-Oriented, People-Centred ASEAN” agreeing to do the following:

“Strengthen efforts to build a people-oriented, people-centred and socially responsible socio-cultural community with a view to achieving enduring solidarity and unity among the ASEAN peoples by instilling a shared appreciation of cultural diversity as well as promoting the well-being and welfare of the peoples;

“Promote and protect the rights of women, children, youth and elderly persons as well as those of migrant workers, indigenous peoples, persons with disabilities, ethnic minority groups, people in vulnerable situations and marginalised groups, and promote their interests and welfare in ASEAN’s future agenda including through the ASEAN Community’s Post-2015 Vision and its attendant documents;

“Alleviate poverty and narrow the development gap by increasing access to basic needs and work towards achieving adequate standards of living in line with our global commitment on poverty eradication;

“Ensure our people’s access to clean water, clean air, basic healthcare and other social services so that they may lead healthy and productive lives and thereby contribute to the ASEAN Community.”
The Philippines has not made a statement on the Rohingya’s plight.

But there is one Filipino who has stood up for the Rohinyas. Former Agrarian Reform Secretary Ernesto Garilao made a personal appeal to President Aquino in Facebook:

“Dear Mr. President, Can we not give them temporary shelter; as we did with the Jews before the war; and the Vietnamese after the Vietnam war. The more important thing is that they don’t die at sea; as they would if no one left a finger. Mr. President, if the face of the circumstance, it is the right thing to do. It is at our Asean backyard.”

Nothing has been heard from Malacañang.

We are part of the community of man. Our many problems should not be an excuse to be oblivious of what is happening beyond our shores.

Our sense of humanity is diminished if we close our eyes and pretend the Rohingya humanitarian crisis is not happening and does not concern us.

Published inForeign AffairsHuman Rights

5 Comments

  1. Aungsan Suu Kyi: what a disappointment

    http://nytlive.nytimes.com/womenintheworld/2015/03/23/aung-san-suu-kyi-is-a-bust/

    “In the face of these rights violations, Suu Kyi’s silence or mealy-mouthed equivocation has tarnished her image as an icon of democracy. To suggest, as she does, that atrocities are committed on both sides—by Rohingya and the majority Arakanese in Rakhine state—is a distortion of the truth.

    “Similarly, to refuse to condemn the atrocities against the Rohingyas on the grounds that condemnation is counter-productive to results, as she does, is disingenuous. Coming from someone whose primary political weapon during her two-decade battle with the junta ruling Myanmar has been her moral authority, it is also grotesquely distasteful.”

  2. chi chi

    Tradpol na rin si Suu Kyi, what a disappointment!

    They are so racists over in Myanmar!

    “They argue that Rohingyas are not a genuine ethnic group but Bengali migrants who represent a divisive leftover from colonial times.”

    So, Myanmar just want them all to die because the Rohingyas are not natural born Burmese?! Dafuq!

  3. Show compassion or face the risk of increasing problems in the future? Such a dilemma.

    Norway had deported Muslim immigrants and refugees of about 5,000 in 2014 because of the rise in crimes. The news reported those number, but a friend in Norway who works in a refugee camp says it’s 13,000.

    Even Norwegian Muslims are now calling for an independent state.

  4. RAPPLER – De Lima proposes rescue ships for Rohingya

    This gesture is most welcome. We did it to the Jews in WW2 and again to the Vietnamese Boat People after Vietnam War. We have the experience handling refugees some Vietnamese have even converted to Filipinos and they have become productive citizens here, especially in Palawan.

    For ASEAN to be taken seriously around the globe, we must practice what we preach, especially after the 26th Summit at KL. Besides, we are signatory to the 1951 Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees and the 1954 Convention Relating to the Status of Stateless Persons.

Leave a Reply